Even
though we grew up in different regions we have always loved the natural world,
hiking and camping with scouts and climbing neighbors’ trees as children. But
the books we read promoted respect for animals more than a broader vision of
the environment.
We both fell in love with monkeys after reading Toby Tyler, or Ten Weeks with the Circus,
horses after reading The Black Stallion and
wild animals after discovering Wild
Animals of North America.
But as researchers, two books stood out as guides
for real interdependent relationships with nonhuman nature: Ellen
Swallow Richards’ Sanitation in Daily
In
Sanitation in Daily Life, Richards
demonstrates that humans are part of nature, generating the basis for the human
ecology movement. For Richards, urban problems like air and water pollution were
products of human activity imposed on the environment and, subsequently, best
resolved by humans. The human ecology movement evolved into home economics, but
its grounding in conservation had lasting effects, including the environmental
justice movements, health ecology, and urban planning.
In Sand County
Almanac (1949), Aldo Leopold advocates for the good of all life as part of
an ecosystem that includes humans, nonhuman animals, and plant life, not just
those animals seen as sentient. For Leopold, “the individual is a member of a community
of interdependent parts,” and those parts include all elements of the natural
environment, from soil and plants to Bambi. A graduate of the Yale forestry
school, Leopold promoted game management, evolutionary biology, and ecology,
rather than sentimental anthropomorphism.
No comments:
Post a Comment